Christian R. Prause
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a PhD research that deals with improving internal documentation in software projects. Software developers often do not like to create documentation because it has few value to the individual himself. Yet the purpose of internal documentation is to help others understand the software and the problem it addresses. Documentation increases development speed, reduces software maintenance costs, helps to keep development on track, and mitigates the negative effects of distance in distributed settings. This research aims to increase the individuals' motivation to write documentation by means of reputation. The CollabReview prototype is a web-based reputation system that analyzes artifacts of internal documentation to derive personal reputation scores. Developers making many good contributions will achieve higher reputation scores. These scores can then be employed to softly influence developer behavior, e.g. by incentivizing them to contribute to documentation with social rewards. No strict rule enforcement is necessary.
- D. Bertram, A. Voida, S. Greenberg, and R. Walker. Communication, collaboration, and bugs: the social nature of issue tracking in small, collocated teams. In CSCW, pages 291--300. ACM, 2010. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- B. Boehm. Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer, 35:64--69, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Brown, Y. Cai, Y. Guo, R. Kazman, M. Kim, P. Kruchten, E. Lim, A. MacCormack, R. Nord, I. Ozkaya, R. Sangwan, C. Seaman, K. Sullivan, and N. Zazworka. Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems. In FoSER. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. H. Coase. The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1):1--44, 1960.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31:1268--1287, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Dencheva, C. R. Prause, and W. Prinz. Dynamic self-moderation in a corporate wiki to improve participation and contribution quality. In Eur. Conf. Comp.-Supp. Coop. Work, ECSCW. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Forward and T. C. Lethbridge. The relevance of software documentation, tools and technologies: a survey. In DocEng, pages 26--33. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162:1243--1248, 1968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Harman. Why source code analysis and manipula- tion will always be important. In SCAM. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Hoisl, W. Aigner, and S. Miksch. Social rewarding in wiki systems -- motivating the community. In Online Communities and Soc. Comp. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Hunt and D. Thomas. The Pragmatic Programmer. Addison-Wesley Longman, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2):618--644, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. E. Lewis. Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement. Auerbach, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. P. Lientz and E. B. Swanson. Problems in application software maintenance. Communications of the ACM, 24(11):763--769, 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. S. Poulin. Populating software repositories: Incentives and domain-specific software. Journal of Systems and Software, 30:187--199, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Prause, J. Kuck, S. Apelt, R. Oppermann, and A. B. Cremers. Interconnecting documentation - harnessing the different powers of current documentation tools in software development. In Ninth ICEIS, volume ISAS, pages 63--68. INSTICC, 2007.Google Scholar
- C. R. Prause. Maintaining fine-grained code metadata regardless of moving, copying and merging. In 9th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, SCAM. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Prause. A software project perspective on the fitness and evolvability of personal learning environments. In Exploring the Fitness and Evolvability of Personal Learning Environments, 2011.Google Scholar
- C. R. Prause and S. Apelt. An approach for continuous inspection of source code. In International Workshop on Software quality, WoSQ. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Prause and M. Eisenhauer. Social aspects of a continuous inspection platform for software source code. In Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Prause, M. Jentsch, and M. Eisenhauer. Mica - a mobile support system for warehouse workers. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research (IJHCR), 2(1):1--24, January-March 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Prause, R. Reiners, and S. Dencheva. Empirical study of tool support in highly distributed research projects. In 5th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE, pages 23--32. IEEE Computer Society, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. R. Prause, R. Reiners, S. Dencheva, and A. Zimmermann. Incentives for maintaining high- quality source code. In Psychology of Programming Work in Progress Meeting, PPIG WiP, 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Raskin. Comments are more important than code. ACM Queue, 3(2):64--62 (sic!), 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Selic. Agile documentation, anyone? IEEE Software, 26(6):11--12, Nov/Dec 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Spinellis. Code documentation. IEEE Software, 27:18--19, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. D. Stacey. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: the challenge of complexity. Financial Times, 1999.Google Scholar
- M. Umarji and F. Shull. Measuring developers: Aligning perspectives and other best practices. IEEE Software, 26(6):92--94, Nov./Dec. 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Williams and B. Kessler. The effects of "pair-pressure" and "pair-learning" on software engineering education. In 13th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training. IEEE, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Wray. How pair programming really works. IEEE Software, 27:50--55, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Yamabe, V. Lehdonvirta, H. Ito, H. Soma, H. Kimura, and T. Nakajima. Applying pervasive technologies to create economic incentives that alter consumer behavior. In UbiComp. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Reputation-based self-management of software process artifact quality in consortium research projects
Recommendations
The Role of Reputation on Trust and Loyalty: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Tablet E-Tailing
The purpose of this article is to empirically examine the role of online retailer's website reputation on tablet commerce and to compare the trust arbitration between reputation and loyalty in two cultures-Finland and Nigeria. Data was collected from ...
The role of perceived usability, reputation, satisfaction and consumer familiarity on the website loyalty formation process
The increasing competitiveness in electronic business is motivating varying research on the principal antecedents of consumer loyalty. However, previous research is too scarce, so that there are notable aspects which must be analyzed in-depth. This ...
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision
Trust and reputation systems represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet mediated service provision. The basic idea is to let parties rate each other, for example after the completion of a transaction, and use the aggregated ratings ...
Comments